Saturday, April 23, 2011

Beach Profiling

Introduction:

Beach profiling is a great way to study beach erosion. If you take multiple beach profiles, you can very effectively compare the size and shape of sand dunes over time. The results of beach profiling can be affected by many factors. For example, if there are ditches or cliffs in the dunes, they will show in the final profile. Over time, beaches can be shaped by a variety of factors, including wind, waves, and tide. Rain often erodes beaches, changing their shape. Other things affecting the beach's sand levels are human activity such as walking or driving along the beach. The very successful dune restoration project at our specific beach will also undoubtedly affect profiles as well; if we had taken these profiles before the restoration project was initiated, the beaches would have been much flatter.

Procedure:

1. Collect materials (Rise tool, run tool, compass, GPS, data sheet, transect line, writing utensil) and go to beach.

2. Find a point on a sand dune a little ways inland, and take the latitude/longitude coordinates of that point using the GPS (This will be Point A). Record data.

3. Starting at Point A on the dune, lay the transect line exactly perpendicular to the shoreline, going towards the water. BE AS PRECISE AS POSSIBLE.

4. Using the compass, take a reading from Point A telling which exact direction/degree the transect line is running. Record data.

5. Place the run tool firmly on the ground at Point A, pointing down the transect line. Use the level to make it exactly even.

6. Brace the rise tool on the ground at the other end of the run tool (this is Point B), and use the level to even it out.

7. Look where the run tool points to on the rise tool. The number it touches is the rise from point A to point B. If the dune slopes upward, it should be a negative number. Record the rise as well as any notable features included between the two points.

8. Move the foot of the run tool to the foot of the rise tool and switch them carefully, making sure to use the exact same point. Make sure the run tool is still even and pointing along the transect line. Move the rise tool to the other end of the run tool and, using the same method as step 7, collect data.

9. Repeat step 8 until you reach the waters edge, then repeat the same data-collecting process into the water. Continue until you reach the “foot” of the beach, a small dip in the sand just offshore (almost all beaches have them).

Pictures:

Here we are taking the GPS coordinates of our starting point (step 2).

Here we are taking the actual data (step 7). We're getting closer to the foot of the beach with every step!

Results:

Beach Profile

Here we have the slope of the beach at transect 2. This should be pretty close to the actual shape of the dune, although if we were to be perfectly precise, this graph would be stretched dramatically length-wise. Overall though, it's a good representation of the beach . . .

Current Map:

. . .here we have a current map of south Kalepolepo. We carefully tossed a special scientific floating tool (a rotten guava) into the ocean and recorded its progress through the water, noting the shape and speed of the current. It took us a few times to do this correctly; we kept losing sight of our guavas and having to start over. This is the final result.

Saturday, April 9, 2011

Sandman Lab

Introduction: Sandy beaches form many of the world's seashores, dividing the vast ocean from the land. This sand can come in many consistencies and colors. It can be anything from powdery to gravelly, raning in color from yellow to red to black to green. Sand can come from two different sources, living and non-living. Biogenic sand comes from sources that once lived: coral, skeletons, shells, etc. Detrital sand originates from nonliving sources: rocks and minerals. And though you may not be able to tell these two types of sand apart just by looking, there is a way to check. If you mix biogenic sand - which contains calcium carbonate (CaCO3) - and vinegar (CH3COOH), you get a number of results. Namely water (H20) calcium acetate (Ca(CH3OOH)2), and carbon dioxide (C02). If the sand is indeed biogenic, the carbon dioxide will cause the sand to bubble slightly and make a crackling sound. If neither of these reactions happens, then the sand is detrital. Question: Are there beaches of both biogenic sand and detrital sand in South Maui, and if so, which are which? Hypothesis: I believe that the ever-popular Big Beach consists primarily of biogenic sand. There is a dead coral reef that runs parallel to the shoreline, and the infamous powerful waves at Big Beach could easily be responsible for eroding it. The sand is also very light and fine, traits often found in biogenic sand. Meanwhile, the sand at the Makena Black Sand Beach should be at least partially detrital, because of the large, worn cliffs on one side of the beach. If my hypothesis is correct, then we should observe a chemical reaction between the vinegar and the Big Beach sand, and a much smaller reaction with the Black Sand Beach sand. Materials:

  • Sand samples

  • Acetic acid (vinegar) (("the good stuff"))

  • Clipboard

  • Writing utensil

  • Data sheet

  • Small beaker

  • Bulb syringe

Procedure:



  1. Go to beaches outlined in hypothesis

  2. Observe beach areas for clues as to whether the sand will be detrital or biogenic, write observations on data sheet

  3. Collect sand sample (make sure to mark which beach it is from)

  4. Return to lab with multiple sand samples

  5. Pour first sand sample into small beaker, only enough to ensure it covers the bottom

  6. Carefully squeeze exactly 20 drops of vinegar (one milliliter) onto the sand using the bulb syringe

  7. Watch the sand for light bubbling and listen carefully for crackling sounds (if you can see or hear these reactions, then the sand is biogenic)

  8. Record observations

  9. Repeat steps 6-8 with second sand sample

  10. Compare and conclude

Observations:


"Big Beach"



The sand at Big Beach is mostly very light and very fine. When you look closely, you can observe small pieces of shells mixed in, along with a few black and red colored grains of sand. There is a dead coral reef that runs parallel to the shore here, and it is likely that the large shorebreak at this beach contributes greatly to its erosion. At either end of the beach, there are relatively small lava-rock outcroppings, but neither are very prominent.



The southern half of Big Beach.

The northern half of Big Beach.

"Black Sand Beach"



The sand here is multicolored, containing everything from black to red to white to pink sand. However, it is mostly red and dark grey, like the large cliffs on its left side. Though there is a large reef a little ways offshore, it is mostly alive and thus doesn't erode much. There are quite a few white shell fragments mixed in with the dark sand, which is relatively fine but not as fine as that of Big Beach.


The cliffs on the southern half of the beach. They likely contribute to the darkness of the sand.


Data:

Big Beach:

Sand: Very light yellow-brown. Fine and powdery.

Reaction: Small bubbles and light crackling.

Black Sand Beach:

Sand: Dark grey with grains of red and light sand. Slightly coarser than Big Beach's.

Reaction: Small bubbles and light crackling.

Conclusion:

The chemical test revealed some interesting results. Though the sand colors and consistency were nearly opposite each other, both samples proved to contain significant amounts of biogenic sand. I predicted that the Black Sand Beach sample would consist at least partially of biogenic sand, but I assumed that portion of the sample would be minimal. I hoped that we would be able to differentiate the two samples by comparing the volume and intensity of the crackling and bubbling when we added vinegar to them. Theoretically, the sample with less biogenic sand should have a smaller reaction. Either this is not the case at all, or both Big Beach and the Black Sand Beach have equal amounts of biogenic material in their sand makeup (extremely doubtful.) I still believe that black sand is mostly detrital, but unfortunately this particular method of testing neither confirmed nor disproved this hypothesis.

Possible Sources of Error:

There are not many possible sources of error in this particular experiment; I can only think of two. Firstly, when collecting sand samples, we may have collected from sand deposits on the beach that, for some reason or other, contained more biogenic material than the rest of the beach. This, however, is quite doubtful, since generally sand is well balanced. Second (and more plausible), we could have accidentally applied more than a millileter of vinegar onto black sand beach sample, thus altering the intensity of the reaction and making it equal to that of the almost fully-biogenic Big Beach sand.